The Critique Magazine Logo
    • Popular
    • Latest
    The Critique MagazineThe Critique
    Login
    SOURCES & ACTIVISM

    Press Freedoms in Uganda on Trial

    Why the Parliament Should Not Preach Water and Drink Wine

    By: Akampurira Agapito

    31 Oct, 2025

    Share
    Save

    The Parliament of Uganda has been in the news recently, following the dismissal of the Nation Media Group (NMG), one of the leading independent media groups in the country, from covering the proceedings within the August House. This blockage was immediately condemned by many actors, including lawyers, journalist associations, human rights activists, and NMG itself.

    Whereas Article (79) Clause (1) of the 1995 Constitution of Uganda as amended mandates the parliament to make laws, Clause (3) of the same article mandates them to “protect the constitution and promote the democratic governance of Uganda.” Whether they've upheld their mandate, as far as protection and observance of press freedoms are concerned, is something that even the blind can see its inefficiency.

    So, when they recently kicked out Nation Media journalists, accusing them of misconduct and reaffirming that investigations are ongoing, as remarked by the Deputy Speaker Thomas Tayebwa, it kept many fuming, especially those who know that press freedom is a non-derogable right and can't be granted by anyone, including the state, but rather must be respected by everyone, including those in high seats of power. This is cited in Chapter Four of our constitution, Article 20, Clause (1).

    One of the learned scholars in this country, Dr Adolf Mbaine (PhD), often relates media freedoms to a tethered goat, saying endlessly in his public lectures, “No matter how long the rope, a tethered goat is never free!” Hopefully, the media doesn't need the rope anymore, for times of grazing have since changed.

    In the laws of natural justice, the grieved cannot be the judge in his own case, a role the Parliament is trying to play. Let them run to the courts of law if they feel offended. But blocking the journalists from doing their work and deciding their case doesn't only violate the freedom of the press and other media as enshrined in Article 29(a) but also violates the citizens' right to access to information as enshrined in Article 41, Clause (1).

    As the parliament, which is a custodian of the law, follows the wrong procedures to persecute this media group, which has since claimed not to know what their misdeeds are, they are best likened to the proverbial pastor or priest who preaches water on the altar in daylight but drinks himself silly with wine at the end of the mass in the dark.

    The citizens, too, may find no use in following the law of the land if those meant to protect the law are knowingly offending the same. Let them swallow their egos and opt for reconciliation. Otherwise, one of the greatest African authors, Chinua Achebe (RIP), once remarked that, “When you see a frog running in broad daylight, know that something is after its life.”

    💬Comments(0)

    Sign in to join the conversation

    The Critique Magazine

    Copyright Notice: All rights reserved. All the material published on this website should not be reproduced or republished without prior written consent.

    Copyright to the material on this website is held by The Critique Magazine and the contributors. Any violation of this copyright will be subject to legal proceedings under intellectual property law.

    Navigation

    HomeGlobal WatchLatestPopularSubmissionsIssues

    Magazine

    AboutThe VerdictInner Reflection

    Copyright 2026 - The Critique Magazine

    Most popular

    1

    Uganda’s Electoral Trajectory: Power, Legitimacy, and the Battle for the Democratic Future

    Uganda’s political and electoral history is not merely a record of elections held and winners declared.

    ABESON ALEX

    2

    When Poverty Replaces Policy: Youth Elections and the Crisis of Democratic Participation in Uganda

    Reimagining Youth Political Participation Beyond Poverty and Patronage

    ABESON ALEX

    3

    Dr Lina Zedriga Waru’s charge sheet reeks of legal errors: A case study in prosecutorial incompetence

    Uganda’s justice script now reads like satire: vanish a suspect, deny it under oath, then charge them anyway—law rewritten as theatre for power.

    Kakwenza Rukirabashaija

    4

    Monument of Pride

    A poetic reflection on how stories of past glory are passed down, while younger generations quietly carry the burdens and consequences left behind.

    Akoragye Edgar

    5

    In Conversation With Human Rights Lawyer Eron Kiiza on Dr Lina Zedriga's Disappearance and Prosecution

    Post-election abductions and prosecutions expose a justice system accused of shielding power while crushing opposition under the pretext of public order.

    The Critique Magazine

    6

    Beyond Campaigns: Reclaiming Youth Leadership, Ethics, and the Future of Uganda’s Politics

    A generation mobilised but not empowered: The dangerous collapse of ethics and knowledge in youth leadership.

    ABESON ALEX

    7

    Too Late for Uganda

    Why Europe Is Only Now Acknowledging That the System It Relied on No Longer Holds

    Konrad Hirsch

    8

    The European Union Must Turn Rhetoric on Uganda into Action

    The EU's vote: a moral compass or just a gesture?

    Kakwenza Rukirabashaija

    9

    To Be Born Is to Die, and to Die Is to Be Born

    Birth and death aren’t opposites but mirrors: Every beginning kills an old self, and every ending gives rise to another form of becoming.

    Abdullatif Khalid Eberhard

    10

    “Mama Lina” and the Charge That Turns Reality Upside Down

    Charging a peace mediator with incitement signals a justice system punishing dissent and protecting power, not public order, in Uganda’s politics.

    Konrad Hirsch