The Critique Magazine Logo
    • Popular
    • Latest
    The Critique MagazineThe Critique
    Login
    SOURCES & ACTIVISM

    Press Freedoms in Uganda on Trial

    Why the Parliament Should Not Preach Water and Drink Wine

    By: Akampurira Agapito

    31 Oct, 2025

    Share
    Save

    The Parliament of Uganda has been in the news recently, following the dismissal of the Nation Media Group (NMG), one of the leading independent media groups in the country, from covering the proceedings within the August House. This blockage was immediately condemned by many actors, including lawyers, journalist associations, human rights activists, and NMG itself.

    Whereas Article (79) Clause (1) of the 1995 Constitution of Uganda as amended mandates the parliament to make laws, Clause (3) of the same article mandates them to “protect the constitution and promote the democratic governance of Uganda.” Whether they've upheld their mandate, as far as protection and observance of press freedoms are concerned, is something that even the blind can see its inefficiency.

    So, when they recently kicked out Nation Media journalists, accusing them of misconduct and reaffirming that investigations are ongoing, as remarked by the Deputy Speaker Thomas Tayebwa, it kept many fuming, especially those who know that press freedom is a non-derogable right and can't be granted by anyone, including the state, but rather must be respected by everyone, including those in high seats of power. This is cited in Chapter Four of our constitution, Article 20, Clause (1).

    One of the learned scholars in this country, Dr Adolf Mbaine (PhD), often relates media freedoms to a tethered goat, saying endlessly in his public lectures, “No matter how long the rope, a tethered goat is never free!” Hopefully, the media doesn't need the rope anymore, for times of grazing have since changed.

    In the laws of natural justice, the grieved cannot be the judge in his own case, a role the Parliament is trying to play. Let them run to the courts of law if they feel offended. But blocking the journalists from doing their work and deciding their case doesn't only violate the freedom of the press and other media as enshrined in Article 29(a) but also violates the citizens' right to access to information as enshrined in Article 41, Clause (1).

    As the parliament, which is a custodian of the law, follows the wrong procedures to persecute this media group, which has since claimed not to know what their misdeeds are, they are best likened to the proverbial pastor or priest who preaches water on the altar in daylight but drinks himself silly with wine at the end of the mass in the dark.

    The citizens, too, may find no use in following the law of the land if those meant to protect the law are knowingly offending the same. Let them swallow their egos and opt for reconciliation. Otherwise, one of the greatest African authors, Chinua Achebe (RIP), once remarked that, “When you see a frog running in broad daylight, know that something is after its life.”

    💬Comments(0)

    Sign in to join the conversation

    The Critique Magazine

    Copyright Notice: All rights reserved. All the material published on this website should not be reproduced or republished without prior written consent.

    Copyright to the material on this website is held by The Critique Magazine and the contributors. Any violation of this copyright will be subject to legal proceedings under intellectual property law.

    Navigation

    HomeGlobal WatchLatestPopularSubmissionsIssues

    Magazine

    AboutThe VerdictInner Reflection

    Copyright 2026 - The Critique Magazine

    Most popular

    1

    All of us must vie to become members of parliament

    Uganda’s constitutional framework transforms parliamentary authority into money, pensions, and protection, while citizens get ritual elections.

    Isaac Christopher Lubogo

    2

    The Tale of Two Voices

    In Uganda, power speaks loudly while dissent is forced into whispers, turning democracy into a contest of volume rather than justice.

    Turyagumanawe Promise

    3

    From Derogable to Functionally Non-Derogable

    Internet Access, Emergency Powers, And the Structural Collapse of Rights Protection in International and Ugandan Constitutional Law.

    Isaac Christopher Lubogo

    4

    The Mirage of Sovereignty: Reflecting on Uganda’s 2026 General Elections

    Ballots were cast in Uganda’s 2026 election, but power remained fenced off—guarded by soldiers, silence, and a hollow constitution.

    MBOIZI JESSY

    5

    Leave The Football: Why young Ugandans should shun their government and elective politics  

    Leave the football before the football leaves you.

    Beyoreka Junior

    6

    Museveni’s Electoral Legacy Performance: A Comprehensive Historical Analysis and Ranking

    Is it tenable that the Museveni of 2026 is as popular as he was when he started in 1986?

    Isaac Christopher Lubogo

    7

    First, They Blessed It; Then, They Vanished: A National Miracle Explained.

    The theology that worked—until it didn’t.

    Abdullatif Khalid Eberhard

    8

    Why Religion Is a Threat to Us All

    The danger is not belief in God, but the systems that demand loyalty instead of truth.

    Abdullatif Khalid Eberhard

    9

    Do literacy gains explain—or contradict—Uganda’s electoral outcomes?

    Educated but Disenfranchised? What Invalid Votes in recent Uganda's 2026 Elections Say About UPE and USE GAINS

    Arinaitwe Reagan

    10

    Uganda after the election: Victory declared, opposition persecuted, people disappeared

    From a Berlin rooftop in September 2025 to abduction on Uganda’s election day: Lina Zedriga, opposition leader, and the price of politics.

    Konrad Hirsch